Hi,
I had a chance to review it (K-m to be exact) in December (head-to-head
test with Pana G10). Very good value for money. Quite handy (a bit too
small for my hands). Good picture quality (at least as long as you shoot
under ISO1600). Didn't liked the in-camera JPEG (a bit too sharpened,
contrasty and saturated), but the results on software RAW-conversions
are nice. However, most probably JPEGs look fine for an "average viewer".
My verdict: Very good camera for a beginner or person, who just want to
take pictures from time to time. Advanced amateurs should aim higher.
BR, Margus
Bong Manayon wrote:
So...has anyone actually tried the K-m (or K2000D)?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
