Interesting. One thing that I wonder about - my own approach to packing multiple containers has always been to split the load, to build redundancy into the system. In other words, if you lose one bag in transit, do you really want to lose all of your Remote gear? Wouldn't you rather have the Remote equipment scattered among multiple bags so that the chances are at least some will get through? This is a fundamental principle in expedition planing, where you can always assume that some loads will be lost in transit, some in customs, and some when a yak or sherpa falls off the trail and into a river. As all grandmothers everywhere used to say, don't put all of your eggs into one basket... Once you arrive on site, you can repack the bags for convenience and ready access.
stan On Aug 10, 2008, at 12:46 AM, David Savage wrote: > ...& the missus (or mister) complains that you've packed too much: > > <http://www.vincentlaforet.com/Gear/index.html> > > ..show them this. > > Cheers, > > Dave > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
