Joseph McAllister wrote: > Do you know how much fun it is for those of us who get the digest, and > I imagine even those who get each individual email, to have to go > through this kind of junk every day? Can't your email software creat a > reply from a selected bit of an email? > > The following is a message from one person, and as far as I can tell, > nary a line of new text was inserted! > > C'mon. Let's pay attention, please! My carpal tunnel is acting up > already. > > Joseph (a natural born whiner) > > >> From: "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: August 6, 2008 11:10:52 AM PDT >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: PPG latest group a strike out >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> >> >>> I love blue jays >>> ann >>> From Toronto? ;+) >> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "ann sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: PPG latest group a strike out >> >> >>> >>> David J Brooks wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Christine and Jostein >>>> >>>> Here is the one that made it. >>>> >>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/2653056870/ >>>> >>>> It was a last minute submission, i was not really happy with the >>>> crop, >>>> but i threw it in anyway. >>>> >>>> May be thats what i should do from now on, just toss em in there.:-) >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>> LOL - sweet jay! and nice grab... I didn't get to see your rejects - >>> repost link or send off list??? >>> >>> I love blue jays. >>> >>> ann >>> >>>> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Christine Aguila >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Dave: That's great news. Congrats! Cheers, Christine >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >>>>> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 5:30 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: PPG latest group a strike out >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Well, it looks as if number seven was accepted. Funny, i thought >>>>>> this >>>>>> would be one that would be declined. I liked the shot, but was >>>>>> unsure >>>>>> if it fit the PPG system that well....:-) >>>>>> >>>>>> It was of the bluejay taking a peanut that i had as a Paw a few >>>>>> weeks ago. >>>>>> The other 6 were declined. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks if anyone voted for it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dave >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:18 AM, AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Since yesterday my puffin shot was rejected. Some shots are >>>>>>> difficult >>>>>>> to find alternative titles for, though... :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jostein >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2008/8/1 Bong Manayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jostein, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Won some lost some; one photo got in though...after being >>>>>>>> declined, I >>>>>>>> edited the title and now its in. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bong >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:03 AM, AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2008/7/29 David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Six of the seven photos i submitted about 15 days ago have >>>>>>>>>> been >>>>>>>>>> rejected. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have one hanger on still.. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Xing fingers.:-) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> xing some for you too, Dave. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jostein >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ >>>>>>>>> http://alunfoto.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >>>>>>>>> above and >>>>>>>>> follow the directions. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Bong Manayon >>>>>>>> http://www.bong.uni.cc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >>>>>>>> above and >>>>>>>> follow the directions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ >>>>>>> http://alunfoto.blogspot.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >>>>>>> above and >>>>>>> follow the directions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Equine Photography >>>>>> www.caughtinmotion.com >>>>>> http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ >>>>>> Ontario Canada >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >>>>>> above and >>>>>> follow the directions. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >>>>> above and follow the directions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >>> and follow the directions. >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > Fernando wrote: > Switch to individual mails in a free gmail account; you get a thearded > view, close to a forum; is worth the try.
frank theriault wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Joseph McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Do you know how much fun it is for those of us who get the digest, and >> I imagine even those who get each individual email, to have to go >> through this kind of junk every day? Can't your email software creat a >> reply from a selected bit of an email? >> >> The following is a message from one person, and as far as I can tell, >> nary a line of new text was inserted! >> >> C'mon. Let's pay attention, please! My carpal tunnel is acting up >> already. >> >> Joseph (a natural born whiner) >> > > That was a good whine, Joseph (but a worthy one). > > I agree. It's so easy to snip off all superfluous material so that > when replying one only sees your reply plus the post that you're > actually replying to. Seeing entire threads replicated time after > time, ever-growing as one scrolls through threads is a pia for those > of us who get individual e-mails, too. It's a waste of bandwidth. > > cheers, > frank > Derby Chang wrote: > frank theriault wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Joseph McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Do you know how much fun it is for those of us who get the digest, and >>> I imagine even those who get each individual email, to have to go >>> through this kind of junk every day? Can't your email software creat a >>> reply from a selected bit of an email? >>> >>> The following is a message from one person, and as far as I can tell, >>> nary a line of new text was inserted! >>> >>> C'mon. Let's pay attention, please! My carpal tunnel is acting up >>> already. >>> >>> Joseph (a natural born whiner) >>> >>> >> That was a good whine, Joseph (but a worthy one). >> >> I agree. It's so easy to snip off all superfluous material so that >> when replying one only sees your reply plus the post that you're >> actually replying to. Seeing entire threads replicated time after >> time, ever-growing as one scrolls through threads is a pia for those >> of us who get individual e-mails, too. It's a waste of bandwidth. >> >> cheers, >> frank >> >> > > Except pun threads :) > > On the other hand, can I add a whinge about snipping too much, > especially the web links in a GESO/PESO? I often miss an orignal post, > but manage to catch it later on from a reply. Oh, and it would be great > if the PESO/GESO were left in the subject line so my filters work. > > D > frank theriault wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Except pun threads :) > > Yes, I agree with that. ;-) > >> On the other hand, can I add a whinge about snipping too much, >> especially the web links in a GESO/PESO? I often miss an orignal post, >> but manage to catch it later on from a reply. Oh, and it would be great >> if the PESO/GESO were left in the subject line so my filters work. > > Well, too ~much~ snippage isn't a good thing either. It's always a > good idea to keep the url in a PESO/PAW reply since it does happen > that one doesn't get the original and only sees a reply. > > Both points well-taken, Derby! > > cheers, > frank George Sinos wrote: > It used to bug the heck out of me until I dedicated a free gmail > account to pdml. > > The nice thing about gmail, is that it threads everything for you. > It's better than either the digest or the individual messages. > > GS > >> That was a good whine, Joseph (but a worthy one). >> > Cotty wrote: > On 6/8/08, George Sinos, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> It used to bug the heck out of me until I dedicated a free gmail >> account to pdml. >> >> The nice thing about gmail, is that it threads everything for you. >> It's better than either the digest or the individual messages. > > > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! > Sorry. I guess I just don't get what's bothering you people. Were you needing a gmail invite, Cotty? I think I have a few left. -- Scott Loveless New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, USA http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
