Scott Loveless wrote:
> P. J. Alling wrote:
>   
>> The biggest problem I see is spools and backing paper, the spools, at 
>> least the old metal ones, can probably be recycled indefinitely, but 
>> backing paper might be a problem for 120 and other more esoteric film 
>> sizes.  
>>     
>
> The original spools were wood with metal ends.  They wouldn't be 
> difficult to make.  The paper, on the other hand, would be.  The whole 
> thing is defined in ISO 732, but finding the right kind of paper might 
> be iffy.
>   
Those looking for less common film sizes such as 620 and 127 actually 
need the metal spools, they were never made out of wood and a wooden 
spindle probably wouldn't be practical.  There are plastic spools in 
both sizes but they are not particularly robust.  We are, (at least I 
am), talking about film coating being re-born as a cottage industry.  As 
has been mentioned before B&W film and chemical manufacture doesn't have 
to be a particularly high tech industry. 

-- 

Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
   -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to