The FA20-35/4 is good enough to be considered four prime lenses in one, IMO. Very handy, and still quite reasonable in size/weight. :-)
Biggest reason to select any of the primes in this range is to get a little more speed for low light (and its not much more in the case of the DA21/3.2 ...). Finding a 20-35/4 today, however, is a bit problematic. They're long out of production and stocks of them have seemingly dried up. Godfrey On Apr 8, 2008, at 5:57 AM, Jerome wrote: > Hate to be a deviant but... > > If size was an issue, then I'd take my FA 20-35mm f4 zoom lens. This > by > far has been my most used lens over the past 12 months (probably an > 3-to-1 > ratio with all others combined). At the end of the day, philisophical > debates aside, the quality of this lens is reasonable enough that I'd > prefer the flexibility over the improved optics of a prime. > > Disclaimer: > I've only got 4 primes: 50, 100, 300, & 400 mm. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
