No, there's a fair difference between those two lenses. The 28 would
perform on the K200D like the 40 would on a 35mm body, not like the
40mm does on the K200D. The crop factor always applies as focal length
is focal length. The only difference between a 40mm FF lens and 40mm
DA lens is the latter won't necessarily cover a 35mm frame.
Ironically, the DA 40mm is actually a 35mm full-frame design, being an
update of the SMC-M 40mm f2.8 Pancake (albeit a very thorouhg update,
the original did not use Aspherical elements).

-Adam

On 3/11/08, Marcus A. Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for your thoughts, j.c. I am just thinking that a full-frame
>  28mm prime would perform like a, well, somewhere around 50mm prime
>  with the K200D's smaller sensor. That would be awfully close to the DA
>  40 that I already have, and I am not sure if I really need two primes
>  with such similar focal lengths. But I can see the idea behind it.
>  It's appreciated.
>
>  Marcus
>
>
>  --
>  Am 11.03.2008 um 13:35 schrieb J. C. O'Connell:
>
>
>  > I would get a good 28mm prime. The sma-A F2.8 is
>  > nice if you like manual focus, the later F and FA
>  > versions would do if you want AF. But in any case
>  > a 28mm prime is very useful/high quality on DSLR.
>  > jco
>  >
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>  > Of
>  > Marcus A. Hofmann
>  > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 6:51 AM
>  > To: Pentax-Discuss List Mail
>  > Subject: Seeking lens advice
>  >
>  >
>  > Hello.
>  >
>  > I have recently bought a new K200D. I did photograph a lot until about
>  > 15 years ago, but have only used p+s cameras since then. So I figured
>  > the K200D would be more than sufficient to get back into photography.
>  > I am actually very satisfied with the camera.
>  >
>  > But the bundled 18-55mm/3.5-5.8 lens is kind of dissapointing,
>  > especially when compared to the 40mm/f2.8 limited that I also bought
>  > with the camera (mainly beacuse it was so cute), which produces
>  > beautifully sharp and crisp images. So I am now stuck with the 40mm
>  > prime and need to buy some more glass.
>  >
>  > My old analog setup contained a 50mm/1.4 Minolta prime (which I still
>  > own), a 28-85mm/2.8-something Minolta and a 100-400mm Minolta that I
>  > loved (but which I sold). I've been digging around a little and come
>  > up with the following lenses that seem like what I want, and I'd like
>  > to ask those of you that own one of these for their opinions.
>  > Alternatives are also welcome.
>  >
>  > smc DA* 50-135mm/2,8 ED [IF] SDM
>  >
>  > and
>  >
>  > smc DA* 16-50mm/2,8 ED [IF] SDM or smc DA 21mm/3,2 ED [IF] SDM
>  >
>  > I might also get something like the smc DA* 200mm/2,8 ED [IF] SDM
>  > later, depending on how much I'll actually use the camera.
>  >
>  > So I was wondering if the image quality of the 16-50mm/2,8 is
>  > comparable to that of the 40mm/2,8 limited, or if I should rather go
>  > with the 21mm and 40mm limiteds instead of the 16-50mm zoom. Is the
>  > 50-135mm worth the money, and are there alternatives? I like the fact
>  > that it is weather sealed a lot. Can I use the old 50mm/1.4 Minolta
>  > (from the late 80's) on the K200D with an adaptor? Is that
>  > recommendable?
>  >
>  > I might add that I will be taking the thing into the mountains a lot,
>  > and I like to sit in a cafe on a sunday and shoot passers by in the
>  > street.
>  >
>  >
>  > Thanks for any advice.
>  >
>  > Marcus
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>  > [email protected]
>  > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>  > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>  > follow the directions.
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>  > [email protected]
>  > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>  > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>  > and follow the directions.
>
>
>  --
>  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>  [email protected]
>  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> follow the directions.
>


-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to