William Robb wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Paul Stenquist"
> Subject: Re: K20D pictures
> 
> 
>> I'm missing it. I like the results shown here. I recall examples from
>> the *istD that showed clear multicolored banding at long exposures in
>> the dark. If there's anything here it doesn't get in the way of the
>> image. At least not for me. Although anything I'm going to shoot at
>> 6400 would probably end up as BW.
> 
> There is some banding visible in the darker areas, but I figure that at ISO 
> 6400, those areas 
> are probably about 8 stops or more out of range of the sensor.
> This makes the image one of those torture tests that is pretty much 
> guaranteed to bring out 
> flaws.
> In a similar image made at 3200 (7 stops out of range), the banding is very 
> minimal, at 800ISO 
> (6 stops out of range), it is gone, as much as I can see.
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/k20/K20_page2.html (500k page)
> Is the technology perfect?
> I guess not, but it's pretty darned good.
> 
> William Robb 
> 
> 
That second photo looks pretty darn good.  I'm not sure how some of the 
others couldn't see the banding in the 6400 example.

-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to