Thanks Jens. -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Susan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Brillinat Shot, Paul > Regards > Jens (Denmark) > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sendt: 5. marts 2008 19:03 > Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Emne: Re: PESO: Another K20D Pic > > > After about 300 shots I'd have to say the new sensor is a very substantial > upgrade over the K10D's CCD. The noise reduction is amazing, but the image > quality in bright light at low ISO appears to be considerably better as well > in terms of detail and maybe even dynamic range, although the latter is > difficult to judge. I'd say the K20D is a bigger step up than the K10D was > from the *ist series. > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Micah B. Kleit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > That is a really beautiful picture. > > > > Let me ask -- and apologies if this already came up -- one question, > > which hopefully will also help decrease the urge to run up a credit > > card and buy the K20D: beyond the higher megapixel count, has anyone > > compared the performance of the Samsung CMOS with the CCD's Pentax was > > using previously? I know (I think) that the popular preference is for > > CMOS's, but does the new sensor really make a difference? I think I > > read somewhere that the CMOS generates less heat, and therefore less > > noise, which is one of the reasons Pentax can now offer the higher ISO > > settings, but are there any other real advantages? It seems like a > > big deal that Pentax is switching to CMOS, but I haven't really read > > much about how dramatic such a change really is. > > > > On Mar 5, 2008, at 11:23 AM, Ken Waller wrote: > > > > > Hard to believe this was shot @ 3200 ! > > > But I do. > > > > > > Kenneth Waller > > > http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f\ > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: Re: PESO: Another K20D Pic > > > > > > > > >> Forgot the URL on my other reply. Color noise is well controlled as > > >> well. This shot is at ISO 3200 and cropped to about 60% of the frame. > > >> It includes heavy shadows and the noise is minimal. It's also > > >> uniformly blue noise rather than a mix of colors. > > >> This pic is also interesting in that I shot it with the K28/3.5, wide > > >> open. This sometimes overlooked lens is outstanding and sought after > > >> by those who know K glass. It's far better than the A 28/2.8 or the > > >> M. > > >> It's also interesting in that Grace was having a two pacifier day:-). > > >> She still has a bit of a cold and she was worn out from preschool. > > >> Paul > > >> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7021188&size=lg > > >> > > >> On Mar 1, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote: > > >> > > >>> That's really, really good for 1600. > > >>> > > >>> Color me impressed. What about color noise at 1600, > > >>> much worse? > > >>> > > >>> Oh, nice shot too, Paul. > > >>> > > >>> -Brendan > > >>> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> This one is at ISO 1600, weak noise reduction, FA > > >>>> 50/1.4, f2 1/30th. > > >>>> Cropped to about 60$ of frame. > > >>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7007067 > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >>>> [email protected] > > >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > > >>>> directly above and follow the directions. > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> ______________________________________________________________________ > > >>> ______________ > > >>> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > > >>> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >>> [email protected] > > >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > > >>> and follow the directions. > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >> [email protected] > > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > > >> and > > >> follow the directions. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > [email protected] > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > > > and follow the directions. > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow > > the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.4/1313 - Release Date: 05-03-2008 > 09:50 > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
