Thibouille wrote: > http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/184452-post1.html > > Really not that bad. The 40D is a bit better, even at 1600 I do not > see much of a difference. > The ISO3200 is clearly better on the 40D. > I've been meaning to ask; is it just me, or does a picture with the info "shot at ISO-something" (and nothing else) provide very little in terms of useful info?
To me, the ISO setting is a just a value with little meaning in its own right; what I think people should present instead, is (the best possible) shots at a specific exposure setup under specific lightning conditions. - Toralf -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
