[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >In a message dated 1/17/2008 9:19:37 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >The thongs are for women, aren't they? so, um, that lens thing is well, >inappropriate :) > >2 cents from moi (and of course I hope you sell tons of stuff ) > >ann > >============ >Thongs can be for men too. Obviously. Must admit that cracked me up. > >Marnie aka Doe :-) > doesnt' look that way from the ad copy, actually... (the ad copy being the standard drivel that cafe press writes about the product. It was funny though.
"Panty-minimalists love our casual thong that covers sweet spots without covering your assets; putting an end to panty-lines. This under-goodie is "outta sight" in low-rise pants. Toss these message panties onstage at your favorite rock star or share a surprise message with someone special ... later." Now if that isn't ad copy for a gal I don't know what is. however -- when I looked at the photos with the size specifications I see two guys and one gal.. ann > >--------------------------------------------- >Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. > > > > >**************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. >http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489 > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
