Alastair Robertson wrote: >http://www.pbase.com/image/91434888. Well 8 actually but 4 big ones - >nice eyelashes too. > >An afternoon potter on one of the local beaches turned up this little fellow. >K10D FA100/2.8 AF540FGZ F22 125th ISO100 +2EV Flash EV -1.5 Handheld >These types of shots are my typical fare but mostly I have posted >PESO's that are a little different and perhaps less successful. >I am interested what people think of these macro nature shots. Not >many on the list post those types of image it seems. > >Comments & Critiques welcome > >Alastair > > > I like him -- and have lots of respect for the patience and dedication one needs to capture these and other little guys. But I'd like to se either a lot LESS depth of field or the rock right behind him sharp... I know its a bitch and a half to get the beastie and all the aesthetic elements just right. Do you have more exposures one can compare to?
As to why there are not more here there may be a "ewewewe - its a "bug" factor" - spiders seem to be on top of a list of small crawly things people distrust. I'm in the "Spiders are our friends" category. And we do have Mark Cassino for stunning dragon-fly pix. ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
