Well, it is technically quite good - much better than I could do, I
think.  It is a rather disturbing type of subject for many, which may
have some impact on why you don't see more shots like this.  Also, the
availability of this type of subject isn't very universal.

Anyway, nicely done.

-- 
Bruce


Wednesday, January 9, 2008, 2:38:04 AM, you wrote:

AR> http://www.pbase.com/image/91434888. Well 8 actually but 4 big ones -
AR> nice eyelashes too.

AR> An afternoon potter on one of the local beaches turned up this little 
fellow.
AR> K10D FA100/2.8 AF540FGZ F22 125th ISO100 +2EV Flash EV -1.5 Handheld
AR> These types of shots are my typical fare but mostly I have posted
AR> PESO's that are a little different and perhaps less successful.
AR> I am interested what people think of these macro nature shots. Not
AR> many on the list post those types of image it seems.

AR> Comments & Critiques welcome

AR> Alastair




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to