Op Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:28:58 +0100 schreef Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Cross processed, in a big lab? How did they manage that? Other question: are these negatives printeable, of is heavy photoshopping the only way to salvage them? Thanks in advance, Regards, Lucas > It was cross processed. They processed it as though it were > transparency film. > Paul > On Jan 5, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Lucas Rijnders wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I just had a roll of Fuji Superia 400 developed (by a Kodak lab, as >> far as >> I know), and it looks odd, to say the least. The film is very dark >> with a >> blue hue, as opposed to the normal orange base color. The lettering >> on the >> side is white-ish, instead of black. I had the impression the >> images are >> in positive, and scanning conforms this. I put a scan up at >> <http:\\www.jenny.dds.nl\lucas\494-01.jpg> >> This is scanned with Vuescan on a Minolta Scan Dual III. Scanned as a >> slide, so the image is as-is, not inverted. >> >> The film is fresh (expires 4-2008), stored dry and cool, from a >> batch that >> has not given me problems before. It has not been in the camera for >> long >> (a couple of days at most). Other films from the same camera (shot >> both >> right before and after) are fine. >> >> Does anybody here have any idea what has happened? >> >> Thanks in advance for any answer, >> -- >> Regards, Lucas >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >> and follow the directions. > > -- Ciao, Lucas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
