And a Happy New Year to you to Glenn.:-)

Dave

On Dec 31, 2007 3:08 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 31, 2007 10:39 AM, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm a day early, but, looks like the planet has made another orbit
> > > around the sun, and we still have not blown it up, yet.:-)
> >
> > I sure hope you haven't jinxed the planet Dave. There is still a few
> > hours to go.
>
> I'm not worried.  Given the amount of inertia involved, even if
> something big enough to reverse Earth's course or knock it out
> of its orbit (I'm counting knocking us into a perpendicular orbit
> as a case of "not completing this orbit", as well as events that
> send us hurtling into the sun or out of the solar system -- but
> if we just get bumped into a nearer or farther orbit in the
> ecliptic then I'll only consider that a change of schedule) ..
> given the amount of momentum involved, I have no worries that
> the planet could be accelerated quickly enough to prevent
> completion of our current orbit on or close to schedule.  :-)
>
>
> (But for folks who _like_ to worry, may I suggest Exit Mundi, a
> collection of realistic end-of-the-world scenarios?
> <http://www.exitmundi.nl/exitmundi.htm>)
>
>
> Even the known methods for _destroying_ the Earth, rather than just
> redirecting it so that it fails to complete its current orbit, take
> more than 24 hours, so David hasn't jinxed us even if a very resourceful
> arch-villain is working on it.  See:  How To Destroy The Earth
> <http://qntm.org/?destroy>  "The Earth is built to _last_. It is a
> 4,550,000,000-year-old, 5,973,600,000,000,000,000,000-tonne ball of iron.
> It has taken more devastating asteroid hits in its lifetime than you've
> had hot dinners, and lo, it still orbits merrily. So my first piece of
> advice to you, dear would-be Earth-destroyer, is: do NOT think this will
> be easy."
>
> (This, of course, is a good time to suggest reading Why Destroy The
> Earth <http://qntm.org/?why> as well, which includes arguments for
> why _not_ to.)
>
>
> So my prediction is that despite Mr. Brooks' _admittedly_ premature
> congratulations, the completion of the current orbit is still a safe
> bet.
>
> Whether he's jinxed the _next_ orbit remains to be seen, but fortunately
> most known methods of blowing it up will take more than a year to set up ...
>
>
>                                                 -- Glenn
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to