Good one. A somewhat tighter crop would be nice, but I suspect you're pushing things in that regard. Nice work. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Went to the local State Wildlife Area, again, this AM. Brilliant day > and a nice break from recent, but much needed, rains. > A pro friend has gotten me into hawks at this point. > Am linking a crop from the middle of a shot of a Red-shouldered hawk > taken with my trusty FA 80~320. It's serving me well so far, but am > anxious to eventually get the DA* 60~250 which, I understand, MAY be > available in the spring of '08. > I have no serious intention of becoming 'a wildlife photographer' > accept on a very casual basis. If I were, I'd be thinking 600mm > minimum. > All this type of shot takes is being there and shaking the target > somewhere within the frame, little PS and cropping. > Does give one the feeling of a true "capture", however. > > Jack > > All comments welcome! > > http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=276 > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________ > ____ > Looking for last minute shopping deals? > Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. > http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
