I was better than a quick rejection, but I doubt that you could get it accepted. I don't think it's what they're looking for. Fair? Maybe not, but that seems to be the way things are. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I may do that - my reason to ask here is to see if most people also > feel it should have been rejected or not. If most do, then it isn't > worth resubmitting and I learn something more about my photos. For > this one, I felt it was better than a quick rejection - but maybe I'm > wrong. > > -- > Bruce > > > Friday, December 14, 2007, 4:28:48 PM, you wrote: > > JD> Remember my speedy rejection whine awhile back? > JD> I contacted Carolyn who said that she had, also, had a one day > JD> rejection, was going to re-submit her image and suggested I do the > JD> same. She stated that there had been some voting "issues" during that > JD> particular time. I did re-submit my image and it was ultimately > JD> accepted for the gallery in about a week. > JD> You might re-submit your image.(?) > > JD> Jack > JD> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Hello Jack, > >> > >> speed of rejection - about 1 day. > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> Bruce > >> > >> > >> Friday, December 14, 2007, 3:31:13 PM, you wrote: > >> > >> JD> Bruce, why do not think it was not seen by the judges? > >> > >> JD> Jack > >> JD> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> >> I need to see if my perceptions are off base or not. I was rather > >> >> surprised that the photo I recently showed of the kid with > >> lollipop > >> >> was declined without even making it to the judges. I would have > >> >> thought it would have made it through the peer judging. Let me > >> know > >> >> if I am perceiving wrong...thanks. > >> >> > >> >> Here is the photo: > >> >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/rivercats_0004a.htm > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Best regards, > >> >> Bruce > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> >> [email protected] > >> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > >> >> and follow the directions. > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> JD> > >> JD> > >> > JD> > ________________________________________________________________________________ > ____ > >> JD> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > >> JD> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > >> and follow the directions. > >> > > > > JD> > JD> > ________________________________________________________________________________ > ____ > JD> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > JD> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
