I just recently picked one up, but I haven't used it enough to have a real good feel for it.
My 2 main impressions at the moment are: 1) It is sharp, 2) More prone to CA than my 16-45. Cheers, Dave On 10/31/07, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello list > I just sold a whole bunch of photographs. > And my second Tokina AT-X 2.6-2.8 28-70mm Pro II has got an impact damage. > It won't focus at infinity at 28mm anymore. > Should I buy a DA* 16-50mm? Is it really worh the appr. 1000 USD most > dealers charge? > Any experiences or comments are welcome. > Regards > > Jens Bladt > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.15/1101 - Release Date: 10/31/2007 > 10:06 > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
