No.  But I read publicly available industry reports and news items and am 
referring to what I read.  Good enough?

Tom C.


>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
>Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:49:10 +0000
>
>Tom,
>You know Hoya management? Can you introduce them to the rest of us?
>Paul
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
>From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > May be, but relative comparisons like that don't necessarially fly
> > with those holding the purse strings.
> >
> > I just can't see Hoya management, more pragmatic than the former
> > Pentax mgmt., going down a risky road with a 645D.
> >
> > Tom C.
> >
> > On 10/19/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So did Mamiya. Pentax is a lot more healthy.
> > >
> > > -Adam
> > >
> > > Tom C wrote:
> > > > Pentax basically ignored the 35mm market for several decades and did
> > > > have a respectable MF presence.  Where has that gotten them to 
>today?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tom C.
> > > >
> > > >> From: jtainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> > > >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > > >> Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next 
>camera(s)
> > > >> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:18:18 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
> > > >>
> > > >> "645 bodies and lenses are gone from the Pentaximaging web site. If 
>the
> > > >> 645d does return it will be a large scale "New" Product 
>introduction.
> > > >> Something I don't think Pentax has the chutzpah to carry off. Nor 
>do I
> > > >> think they have the production capacity to meet any kind of real 
>demand
> > > >> for new 645 lenses. Hell they can't even keep up with demand for K 
>mount
> > > >> lenses."
> > > >>
> > > >> All true, but B&H still list a number of 645 lenses, most in stock.
> > > > Pentax's immediate challenge would be some normal and wide-angle 645
> > > > lenses, and they already have a new normal lens on the lens map.
> > > >> Joe
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > >> [email protected]
> > > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
> > > > and follow the directions.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>follow
> > the directions.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>follow
> > the directions.
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>follow the directions.



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to