PJ and Adam, The critical question I have for this sensor arguement is what portion the chip is actively engaged in light gathering. 75%, 85%, 95%? I think you guys are dancing around the issue without addressing it. We can all agree that no sensor can gather 110% of the light falling on it. So what is technology at today? Regards, Bob S.
On 10/15/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry William but you seem to like baiting people. You offer nothing to > the argument so go away. Adam seems to think I don't understand how it > works. While I do. The math tells it all. He seems to think that you can > improve hardware beyond physical laws. My point is that you can trick > those laws but you can't get something for nothing. It's a legitimate > argument. You on the other hand ofter betray your ignorance, and have > complete disdain for people who don't agree with you. You often can't > take a joke, or even realize one has been made.. You can't refrain from > making political comments on the list then try to savage those who > respond. To think I actually sort of liked you, I need to get my head > examined. You and JCO should get a Condo together. > > William Robb wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Adam Maas" > > Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ? > > > > > > > >> High ISO noise performance is an area where most of the market has > >> improved while adding MP. Since there are hard, physical, limits on how > >> much light will hit a sensor site of theoretical max size for the > >> resolution and sensor size, this improvement indicates that we haven't > >> hit the actual physical limits of sensor design. We probably have hit > >> the current max for current sensor production technology, but that's not > >> to say that the production technology won't improve. > >> > >> > >> > > > > This is starting to sound like a JCO hijacked thread. Adam, it's futile to > > argue with these toothless old republicans, they will never admit to their > > ignorance. > > > > William Robb > > > > > > > > > -- > Remember, it's pillage then burn. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
