[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >In a message dated 10/2/2007 4:55:20 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >It seems like the 28 mm still has the same depth of field given any >given aperature when it is on the KX or the digital camera.... > >=============== >It has nothing to do with the adapter, or the lens, really, for that matter. >The image circle or whatever you call it, the image plane, in a DSLR, the >sensor, is smaller than the image plane in a SLR. It's commonly called the >crop >factor..... > >But others will tell you all that. LOL. > Yup - before I saw this post..
> I am finding this funny. It means >you never paid any attention to all the digital discussions on this list. >Because that issue was talked to death when DSLRs first came along. > Aside from the fact that I can't remember anything anymore, it is true that I stayed away from most discussions of DSLRS because I was absolutely convinced I would never own one or even covet one :) now it has been 3 years since I got my first digital camera (point and shoot dark side recommended by Amita as being good bang for the buck). 3 years?? wow - but I've still shot stuff with my LX since... until I sold it to Cesar in June at GFM. >Take care, ann, welcome to the digital world. > >Marnie aka Doe ;-) > One of the nicest things about putting the old lens on the new camera is it feels and sounds like a film camera that way -- because it becomes all manual. one of the unhappy things is, about half the stuff I shoot is too soft - my eyes got used to not having to focus . ann > >--------------------------------------------- >Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. > > > > >************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
