Mark Roberts wrote: > Adam Maas wrote: > >> A fairly large number of commercial buildings are copyrighted in such >> ways. You can photograph them legally, but you can't sell the images >> without a property release. > > IIRC, you can't sell the images for commercial use without a release > but you can sell them as fine art prints, ie, as pieces of art in and > of themselves, without a release. Just like photos of people taken > without a release. Interestingly, the news story was unclear on this > point. >
Yes, that's correct (and of course you can sell them for editorial use without a release as well). -Adam This doesn't apply in Quebec though. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
