There are some things I agree with you on. But in this case you are being a complete idiot. If you want to hear yourself argue you can do it without me.
J. C. O'Connell wrote: > The "bonus" in this case is the problem. The "bonus" > lenses should have a different designation, not be > an unknown "bonus". > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Godfrey DiGiorgi > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 12:16 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: DA70 and 24x36 coverage > > > I agree with Tom. > > Boris, you're making it much more complicated than reality: > > Film body: all lenses up to FA series, include D-FA for full > coverage. If some DA lenses cover larger format, bonus ... otherwise > enjoy the vignette. > > DSLR body: all lenses. > > That's it. > > When I had the MX body, I fitted it with the DA14 lens for a test > look. It illuminated a circle about 27-28mm wide, cut off at top and > bottom by the 24x36 mm format dimension. Perfectly usable (at f/22) > for a square format 24x24mm on the 35mm film format, with field of > view quite similar to that of a Hasselblad SWC. A body with Program > or Shutter Priority capability would have worked the aperture > mechanism too. > > What's confusing with that? > > Godfrey > > > On Oct 2, 2007, at 8:51 AM, Tom C wrote: > > >> You can use them all on film bodies. It's just that with some you >> get a fancy black frame around a circular image. :-) >> >> Tom C. >> >> >> >>> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> I guess you're right. Though admit - if you are choosing lenses and >>> you have both film and digital body, it is extremely confusing which >>> ones you could use on both bodies and which ones you could use >>> only on >>> the digital one. >>> > > > -- Remember, it’s pillage then burn. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
