Ditto. I use flickr, because there is a very active local group (which is a good is a good source of info as to photo ops/events around town) but I find it annoyingly slow, the UI and look is a PITA.
Although I'm finding the ads on photo.net getting more & more intrusive. My preference is to make my own pages & put them up on the web space provided by my ISP. Cheers, Dave On 9/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On my service at work and at home (Comcast cable), photo.net is considerably > faster than flickr. Perhaps it varies by local and/or service. I have no idea. > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Photo.net faster? Not here. That site is dog slow for the most part. > > Flickr's > > speed issues have mostly been resolved when they moved into Yahoo's > > datacentre > > earlier this year. > > > > But if you do want simple, lightweight pages, photo.net delivers well, even > > if > > they do require more massaging of the JPEG before uploading (Flickr doesn't > > require the removal of metadata). > > > > -Adam > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I refer photo.net to flicker. The cost for a full service account is the > > > same. > > But the photo.net pages look much better, and the site is much faster. > > > Paul -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
