Good commentary, Godfrey.  Have you read Rebekah's remarks?  I tend  
to think that this is just another financial black hole.  On the  
surface, I think: great! I can just get a good deal on a DSLR, buy a  
rreasonably-priced printer, hook it up to my IMac, and make as many  
prints as I wish, but then there are those "hidden" costs...ink,  
paper, software, and who knows what else...

Perhaps this is why I have tried to remain ignorant of the DSLR world.

Thanks,
Glen

On Sep 25, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:

> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>> While I have been resistant to digital for quite some time, I find
>> this article interesting.  The idea of getting a good "budget" DSLR
>> has crossed my mind, but I know so little about working within the
>> DSLR format that I cannot get motivated to buy one.  I tend to like
>> prints.  Thus, I ask the supremely elementary question: how does one
>> turn the zeros and ones stored in the DSLR's memory into prints?
>> Would a computer and/or scanner be necessary (I do not have a
>> scanner, but I do have an iMac), or can a camera shop or photo lab
>> supply the means to do this if one does not have a scanner?
>
> You're asking these questions as if you knew nothing at all, which I
> suspect isn't quite true.
>
> - No scanner is used when you're using a digital camera. Scanners are
> used to capture film and print images into digital images. A digital
> camera produces digital images.
>
> - You print a digital camera's photos the same way you print anything
> else: to a printer connected to either camera or computer, to an
> online print service having moved the image files from camera to
> computer, or by using a printer kiosk at a local store.
>
> - If you have an iMac, you connect the camera to the computer with
> its supplied cable. By default, iPhoto (supplied on every Apple
> system by default) will start up and download all the photographs so
> you can sort, show, and print them, to either a connected printer via
> a print service on the internet.
>
>> And, finally, how does the K100D compare to the Nikon...the D40 or
>> D50, I gather?
>
> A matter of opinion. They all work well at the level of questions you
> are posing. If you already have Pentax lenses, it makes sense to buy
> a Pentax DSLR: it will save you money. If you don't have Pentax
> lenses, pick whichever one feels best in your hands and enjoy it ...
> they all work better than the majority of owners can exploit.
>
> Godfrey
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to