The real fuel usage comes in backing away from the subject... Peter Fairweather wrote: > Now Cotty, if you were to take a hammer to the lens mount so that it > could be used on a 4/3rds mount Olympus, it would be a 4000mm lens > equivalent. Then there is the cost of the concrete required as a solid > block to mount it instead of a tripod to cut down the vibrations. Then > there is the truck required to cart it all around. > > But the greatest cost would be the fuel required for the endles > journeys looking for something to actually photograph!! > > Peter > > On 25/09/2007, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 25/09/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >> >>> Shall I inquire as to what the exact zoom range is? (Or is "2000 to >>> 2000" too obviously the answer?) :-P >>> >> Mark, it's just permanently zoomed in, of course. >> >> -- >> >> >> Cheers, >> Cotty >> >> >> ___/\__ >> || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche >> ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com >> _____________________________ >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> > >
-- Remember, it’s pillage then burn. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
