Kind of interesting that you pop up with NZ being an island (a couple 
actually), 
but I do not see any mention of NZ in my post. Also NZ averages much farther 
south than Australia.

Australia may be the smallest continent, but it is still a continent and I do 
not think it can be called a small land mass. I will not argue about water 
moderating weather as I grew up in Michigan. Still, I notice that most of the 
population of Australia is on the south coast. For what it is worth Sydney 
seems 
to be about the same latitude south as San Diego is north. None of this is any 
kind of news to those down under, but may be to one or two of us in the US.

BTW, Mexico has water on both sides and the trade winds blow across it still it 
is kind of warm down there. Also the UK is tempered by the warm gulfstream 
current just being surrounded by water does not moderate their weather all that 
much by itself.

John Francis wrote:
> You don't get the heat.  Small land masses (such as New Zealand
> or the UK) have weather that is dominated by ocean temperatures.
> That's why the UK doesn't have the same climate as Hudson Bay,
> and NZ is far more temperate than Mexico (or inland Australia).
> 
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 04:07:03PM -0400, graywolf wrote:
>> An interesting thing I noticed browsing through my Atlas the other day is 
>> that 
>> Oz is in the same latitude range as Mexico, only south rather than north. I 
>> had 
>> unthinkingly imagined it being farther south. Gor, I couldn't stand the heat.
>>
>>
>> David Savage wrote:
>>> Don't even see it over here.
>>>
>>> We only have 3 "seasons" Hot, Mild & Wet & the plants don't change much, if 
>>> at all, between them.
>>>
>>> Up in the north they only have 2, The Wet & The Dry season.
>>>
>>> :-)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> At 06:40 AM 20/09/2007, Brian Walters wrote:
>>>> True.  Six months away here......
>>>>
>>>> :-)>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> Brian
>>>>
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Brian Walters
>>>> Western Sydney, Australia
>>>> http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
>>>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/brianwalters
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>
>>>>> You know, it's not even fall yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> rg2
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/18/07, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/18/07, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Dave Kennedy wrote:
>>>>>>>> Is the size limit still 600 longest side?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, it's not.  The upload form limits the photo to 256k.  The
>>>>> software
>>>>>>> I'm currently using will automagically resize the photo to a
>>>>> maximum of
>>>>>>> 720 on the long side, so you don't need to worry about the
>>>>> actual
>>>>>>> dimensions of the photo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The current form is here:  http://pdmlpug.org/?p=13
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I got one!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just have to remember to re-size it at home tonight and send it
>>>>> in.
>>>>>> I'd like to get back into the habit of posting PUGs now that that
>>>>> I've
>>>>>> gone all digital.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -f
>>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to