The HD for Indies blog has had a fair bit up about this. Recording is to tethered HDD's (which are smallish in size) and power is not a massive issue. But it's not a camcorder.
-Adam P. J. Alling wrote: > Processing requirements quickly become huge. <understatement>To make > this small enough to be hand held is very, very > expensive.</understatement> Power usage is probably exponential. I've > looked at their web site, they seem to be rather short on specifics as > to data storage and battery/power requirements. I expect this to be > tethered by rather large cables to a data storage device and a large > array of batteries, or maybe the power gird of a small country, (maybe > Albania is for rent). > > > mike wilson wrote: >>> From: Brendan MacRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Date: 2007/09/20 Thu AM 03:48:11 GMT >>> To: pdml <[email protected]> >>> Subject: OT (somewhat) - 12MP that'll do 60fps >>> >>> A friend of mine who is the president of a digital >>> video company turned me on to something new tonight. >>> This camera system promises to make some big waves in >>> Hollywood, and beyond. >>> >> >> >>> http://www.red.com/cameras/photo_tour >>> >>> -Brendan >>> >> This operation was brought up some time ago. I asked than and ask now, "If >> they can buffer 24fps indefinitely, how come we are stuck with a measly >> dozen or so at maybe 2fps?" >> >> >> ----------------------------------------- >> Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email >> Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam >> >> >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
