Paying a price that implies quality, is akin to paying a bit of an
insurance premium to hedge against loss.
It may, also, be perceived as a brand's assurance of satisfaction.

Jack
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You never know.  :-) Pentax needs to compete at both ends of the
> spectrum to 
> be taken seriously, especially with Sony and Panasonic entering the
> picture.
> 
> 
> 
> Tom C.
> 
> 
> >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >Subject: Re: Hoya-Pentax Future - News
> >Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >Do you suppose this could lead to a Pentax being considered a "PRO"
> >camera? One that you would carry with a swagger, proudly exposed and
> >without embarrassment? :/
> >WOW!
> >
> >Jack
> >--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey - your'e converting over to what Herb, Rob Studdert and
> myself
> > > have been
> > > saying for the past 2 - 3 years. :-)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Tom C.
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> > > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> > > >Subject: Re: Hoya-Pentax Future - News
> > > >Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:19:27 -0400 (EDT)
> > > >
> > > >0Joseph Tainter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >But it's got to be said they seem to be undervaluing their
> > > products. I
> > > > >was quite surprised when the price of the K10D was announced
> (I
> > > was
> > > > >willing to spend more), & I'm surprised at how relatively
> cheap
> > > the
> > > > >DA* lenses compared to ther N&C equivalents.
> > > > >
> > > > >Obviously their making a profit, but I'm sure it's not as big
> as
> > > it
> > > > >could be.
> > > >
> > > >It looks like the Hoya plan makes sense and that they are going
> to
> > > try
> > > >to try to raise the price and perceived value of their products.
> > > They
> > > >undoubtedly realize that one of the keys to getting people to
> buy
> > > your
> > > >affordable products is providing a higher end product for people
> to
> > > >aspire to -- even though most will never buy it, they like to
> know
> > > they
> > > >*can*; that it's out there. There's also the "prestige by
> > > association"
> > > >effect that Cotty has mentioned in the past: People want the
> name
> > > badge
> > > >on their camera to be the same as [fill in prestigious item you
> > > can't
> > > >afford here]"
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >       
>
>____________________________________________________________________________________
> >Check out the hottest 2008 models today at Yahoo! Autos.
> >http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
> >
> >--
> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >[email protected]
> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image.  Join our Network Research Panel today!   
http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to