If you have screw mount lenses the F is like owning a K1000/KM.  It 
handles and meters almost exactly the same, with just minor differences 
in controls.  My MXs are a bit small, but the SP F is just about 
perfect, I don't shoot it as much as my M42 lens collection is limited 
in scope, (heck, since I got my *ist-D I haven't shot much 35mm film at 
all).

Glen Tortorella wrote:
> Do you own older 35mm bodies?  If so, which ones?  Along with the  
> ZX-5n and ZX-M, I have been considering a Spotmatic F to compliment  
> my current ZX-M.  I have a good general perception now of all three  
> of these cameras.  I know you favor the 5n over the M.  What about  
> the F?  Where would it rank?
>
> Thanks,
> Glen
>
> On Sep 9, 2007, at 12:14 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>   
>> Good question, I don't even know where to look on your camera, all the
>> Pentax's I own are much older or have user replaceable screens, or  
>> both.
>>
>> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>>     
>>> I know that before I bought the camera, it was "professionally"
>>> serviced.  It had new seals installed.  I do have a set of small
>>> screwdrivers.  What would I have to remove, etc.?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Glen
>>>
>>> On Sep 9, 2007, at 11:38 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Depends on your definition of inexpensive, and if you have a shop
>>>> nearby
>>>> with an in house repair guy.  If they have to send it out you  
>>>> might as
>>>> well get a CLA because you'll end up paying for one.
>>>>
>>>> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Thanks, PJ.  Have you ever done this?  If I bring it to a shop, I
>>>>> gather this would be a rather inexpensive repair?
>>>>>
>>>>> Glen
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 9, 2007, at 11:22 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> The viewfinders in most Pentax are not dust sealed. Most likely  
>>>>>> it's
>>>>>> between the focusing screen and the pentaprism. A good repair man
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> usually clean it up. You could do it yourself but a slip of a
>>>>>> screwdriver could mar the surface of your focusing screen which is
>>>>>> infinitely more annoying...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> I agree with whoever replied (I think PJ) that dust or dirt in  
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> viewfinder is somewhat irritating.  To reiterate, I have checked
>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>> the various relevant parts (including the mirror) of my Super
>>>>>>> Program
>>>>>>> and cannot find the specks I see in the viewfinder.  Is there
>>>>>>> any way
>>>>>>> to get them out?  Is this dust or dirt something only a
>>>>>>> professional
>>>>>>> can remove, or is it just stuck there forever?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In retrospect: I wish eBay sellers would be unmistakably clear
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>> these things...such is why I like buying new...there are just too
>>>>>>> many things that can be problematic or objectionable with unseen
>>>>>>> used
>>>>>>> gear.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Glen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>           
>>>> -- 
>>>> Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>
>>>       
>> -- 
>> Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
Remember, it’s pillage then burn.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to