On 20/08/07, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Interesting to me is the fact that it is a CMOS and not a CCD anymore. > Seems everybody shitfs (or tries to) to CMOS.
It's a lot more flexible in implementation, on chip NR, pixel binning, on chip logic and ADC and it's much easier to produce using less specialized processes so cheaper in production. I still think that a good CCD will out-perform a teched up CMOS sensor though. -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
