No that's not all that is needed. For everything to work at the biological
machine/cellular level numerous things have to all be lined up in advance
and occur virtually simultaneously. We're not talking about something as
simple as heads and tails (you know that).
We're talking about about a huge astronomical number, apparently beyond
astronomical actually.
Forget the quarter, take a mouse trap apart and put it in a paper sack.
Shake it around until it randomly assembles itself. Then get back to me.
Tom C.
From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Global warming was: The Nine-spotted
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:09:55 -0400
How about I flip a quarter a hundred times and it comes up heads once? That
is all that is needed. You apparently do not understand random chance any
better than Hoyle.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Tom C wrote:
> Go flip a quarter until it comes up heads 100 times in a row. Then get
> back to me on that. ;-)
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>> From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Global warming was: The Nine-spotted
>> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:44:15 -0400
>>
>> Astronomers do not seem to understand chance, do they. If the chance
>> is a billion to one, what is the change of it happening in the next
>> iteration?
>>
>> One in two, no matter what particular iteration it is in, it has as
>> much chance of happening the next time as it does of not happening. In
>> other words there is no necessity of it going through a billion
>> iterations before it happens. And there is no assurance that it will
>> happen even once in that particular billion iterations. Once again no
>> intelligent design is necessary.
>>
>> --
>> graywolf
>> http://www.graywolfphoto.com
>> http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
>> "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
>> -----------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Tom C wrote:
>> > graywolf wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Hard to accept that you are not somehow special, isn't it.
Personally
>> >> I believe random chance over >millions of years is the simplest
>> answer.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Noted British Astonomer Fred Hoyle wrote (note I'm using this as an
>> > example of a noted and respected scientist, not that I agree with
>> > everything he says or that he's always correct... who is?)
>> >
>> > "if one proceeds directly and straightforwardly in this matter,
without
>> > being deflected by a fear of incurring the wrath of scientific
opinion,
>> > one arrives at the conclusion that biomaterials with their amazing
>> > measure or order must be the outcome of intelligent design."
>> >
>> > Hoyle calculated that the chance of obtaining the required set of
>> > enzymes for even the simplest living cell was one in 10 *40,000
power.
>> > Since the number of atoms in the known universe is infinitesimally
tiny
>> > by comparison (10 *80 power), he argued that even a whole universe
full
>> > of primordial soup wouldnt have a chance. He claimed: The notion
that
>> > not only the biopolymer but the operating program of a living cell
>> could
>> > be arrived at by chance in a primordial organic soup here on the
Earth
>> > is evidently nonsense of a high order.
>> >
>> > Hoyle compared the random emergence of even the simplest cell to the
>> > likelihood that "a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might
>> assemble a
>> > Boeing 747 from the materials therein." Hoyle also compared the
chance
>> > of obtaining even a single functioning protein by chance combination
of
>> > amino acids to a solar system full of blind men solving Rubik's Cube
>> > simultaneously.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Tom C.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net