Considering that the 645D was most likely using K10D-based electronics changed only enough to handle the Kodak sensor(which is significantly larger than 24x36), that would gain us exactly what?
-Adam Tom C wrote: > If it were me, assuming that a reasonable profit margin could be realized, > I'd revamp the 645D guts and put them in a K10D style body and attempt to > sell a high end DSLR that uses regular K-mount lenses. I would guess that > there's a larger potential customer base for that than for a 645D. > > Tom C. > > > >> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: 22 MPix digital MF under 10000$ >> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:49:59 -0400 >> >> Actually the assumption is that the 645D is canceled, based on what I'd >> call Pentax's "Wiggle on the Hook" plan. We really don't know anything >> yet. >> >> Christian wrote: >> >>> Wilko Bulte wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote.. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Yes, it is reality, with stanrard lens: >>>>> http://www.mamiya.com/cameras.asp?id=1&id2=2281 >>>>> I think we can be sure that integrated Pentax 645D using similar >>>>> sized CCD would be even cheaper... Now if only Hoya would allow >>>>> Pentax team to release 645D... >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Assuming the 645D is ready for volume production. Do we know that for >>>> a fact? >>>> >>>> Wilko >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Umm, news is that the 645D has been canceled. >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
