----- Original Message ----- 
From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: My GFM wrap-up (pretty long, probably boring)


> This rampant enabling is one of the reasons I was never into nature 
> photography. A street kind of guy can get by with a 35mm and 100mm (or the 
> digital equivalent) real well.

The nature photography thing has been a pretty pricey hobby. In the mid 80s 
I decided that I wanted better image quality than 35mm was able to give, so 
I went into a Pentax 6x7 system. This worked well as a dual use system, 
since I was able to use it for weddings, both in studio and on location.
Unfortunately, in use, the medium format system had too many limitations WRT 
depth of field, and I also heard the siren call of the Zone System.
An inexpensive 4x5 monorail camera and darkroom equipment to support it fell 
into my lap, and I saw the advantages of 4x5 as a landscape format were too 
great to ignore. Rare were depth of field issues, and being able to control 
film processing according to exposure, rather than using a one size fits all 
method sold me on the format. I aquired a smaller field camera (the monorail 
weighed about 16 pounds) and happily shot sheet film for 18 or so years 
until I had to tear down my darkroom.
Digital opened up some doors regarding longer lenses due to the smaller than 
35mm format. I have always been interested in super telephotos, and getting 
the extra reach from the APS-C sensor is a bonus.

The quality that I was used to with sheet film still isn't there with 
digital, but recently I started playing with multiple overlapped exposures 
and image stitching as a means of increasing quality. This is showing great 
promise, so I will probably now start researching monochrome conversions 
with the idea of seeing if I can produce decent black and white work off the 
computer.

If this all goes well, I may permanently shelve my darkroom (sigh), and stay 
with digital imaging.
Unless Pentax goes TU and my K10 breaks and can't be replaced, anyway.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to