No, not less DOF. I was referring to more (and better) blurre background, which in a sense is a less DOF, but I kind of disliked the bokeh on Toine's pictures...
Boris dFrits Wüthrich wrote: > If you keep the flowers at the same size in the frame, the longer lens will > give you a bigger working distance, and less FOV of the background (which > might help in case you have a distracting backgroung), however not less DOF, > which I assume is what you were referring too. > > On Saturday 26 May 2007 14:31, Boris Liberman wrote: >> I think the longer lens would have produced better defined separation >> between the subject and the background. >> >> Boris >> >> Toine wrote: >>> Two more shots from the same island, Terschelling. This time two >>> different orchids from the same species. >>> http://leende.net/galleries/Terschelling%202007/6405.htm >>> http://leende.net/galleries/Terschelling%202007/6430.htm >>> The first is rendered with a reduced saturation and the second in b&w. >>> I like both renderings but I prefer the low saturation. I would like >>> to hear your comments. >>> >>> Didn't bring my macro lens, the 16-45 is also performing very nicely in >>> macro. >>> >>> -- >>> Toine >>> http://leende.net/peso > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
