Nope, what you have is the same thing as with Apple Computer, and Microsoft. When Apple tried suing MS over Windows, the they lost because they didn't own the technology, it belonged to Xerox who they borrowed it from (some would say stole). In other words Getty can sell it but they can not stop someone else from doing the same. That is what "Public Domain" means.
Getty claiming copyright is just a lie to try and get the gullible to pay them every time they use the image. It is as legal as those nifty license agreements on software that you don't see until after you pay for it. Not binding at all. -graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > That's what I thought. So that selling was is in a government archive is > illegal. Because it is supposed to be free. Well, not sure about that, but > it > sounds right. The copyright stuff has to be illegal. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
