Yeh, I heard something like that. Too, bad that only Kodak seems to realize it <grin>.
P. J. Alling wrote: > More importantly, it ain't digital, film is dead, haven't you heard. > > graywolf wrote: >> Strange, I thought there was. Ah, I see, discontinued. Better get one while >> you can. >> >> http://www.cameraquest.com/voigtFlexTM.htm >> >> -graywolf >> >> P. J. Alling wrote: >> >>> There are millions of M42 mount lenses as well, and I don't see anyone >>> making a Body to use them either. You're just being silly. >>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>>> Not a valid comparison. There are milions of K-mount lenses and users out >>>> there. The CZ mount users numbered in the thousands. >>>> >>>> >>>> -------------- Original message ---------------------- >>>> From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 22/05/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I would guess that if Pentax folds, someone will make a K-mount body. >>>>>> The >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> demand is built in. It would be easy, for example, for Sony to make a >>>>> K-mount >>>>> version of their camera. I can't see the huge installed base of Pentax >>>>> gear >>>>> being ignored. It's a bonanza for someone out there. >>>>> >>>>> No one bothered to make Bob W a DSLR to couple to his superb set of CZ >>>>> Contax/Yashica mount lenses. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Rob Studdert >>>>> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA >>>>> Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO >>>>> http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ >>>>> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
