Not nonsense. Overall, the DS metering calibration was setup for the JPEG defaults (Bright color tone, etc) and underexposes RAW files by .3-.7 EV. This takes a little more work in RAW conversion. The K10D's metering is much more accurate for RAW capture, and I think now (with Camera Raw and Lightroom) the camera settings in the converter are somewhat better. The K10D seems to have about 1EV more dynamic range in capture too, although I haven't done my test measurements yet.
Your familiarity with RAW conversion processing also has its effect. G On May 16, 2007, at 7:00 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote: > Speaking of raw files. > I find the files from K10D easier to konvert than from DS. Could be > because > of better exposure, but I don't think thats the whole explonation. > The ones > that are off seem easier too. Is it because of better dymic range, > giving > more room for adjustments, have I improved my skilles, or am I talking > nonsense? ;-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
