I don't know what they would, could, should have done Peter.  I was simply 
saying that I found it strange.

Tom C.


>From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: Pentax Unveils New Business Plan
>Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 08:31:16 -0400
>
>Boards of directors are not day to day managers of companies.  They meet
>periodontally, this may have been their first chance to take any
>action.  What would they have done before hand.  Act like politicians:
>Go to the news papers?  Make histrionic announcements to the media?  Be
>real.  They got the relevant documents and read through them, at the
>next meeting discussed the implications,and voted.  Things don't happen
>instantly, (unless their minds were already made up which they probably
>weren't), after all lots of people thought this would be good for Pentax
>as a camera company.  Read Herbert Keppler's essay from early this month
>http://www.photoreporter.com/article.asp?issueID=80&num=07&vol=15&articleType=fc&articleID=1410
>Everything looked rosy then.
>
>Tom C wrote:
> > You don't find it strange that almost an entire board pops up one day 
>and
> > says "Hey, a couple of months ago our President made a deal affecting 
>the
> > future of our entire corporation without our knowledge, and we didn't do
> > anything back then, but now we are?"
> >
> > I do.  I'm not reading anything into anything.  I'm simply saying I find
> > that incredible and don't believe we have the full story yet.
> >
> >
> > Tom C.
> >
> >
> >
> >> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: Pentax Unveils New Business Plan
> >> Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 23:06:17 -0400
> >>
> >>
> >> On May 11, 2007, at 8:10 PM, Tom C wrote:
> >>
> >>>   Months passed between the merger
> >>> annoucement and Pentax's unilaterally withdrawing from the agreement.
> >>> Something stinks in Denmark.
> >>>
> >> Idaho.
> >> Seriously, you attempt to read so much into these things that is
> >> based on pure conjecture tempered by little knowledge of the way the
> >> business world works. Take a pill and go to bed.
> >> Paul
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>--
>Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf 
>thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to