May be. I wonder what marketing dept has to say ;-). We're living in the marketing world, Rob.
On 5/10/07, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/05/07, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree with Paul. Consider K1D that is same as K10D but has proper 16 > > bit RAW files and some minor goodies. It will be both a breakthrough > > and a new flagship model. > > Boris, the bit depth issue has been discussed before, it's just of no > benefit to provide RAW files from a sensor with pixels the size of the > K10D (or most particularly smaller) with greater than 12bits per pixel > depth. The extra data bits would be recording nothing but noise > effectively. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
