It was never indicated that the K1D would be full frame. It will merely be an 
upgrade from the K10D, which suits me just fine.
Paul
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Brendan MacRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > > Pentax To Sell Tokyo HQ, Quit Low-Profit Ops To
> > Lift Corp  Value
> > > 
> > > TOKYO (Nikkei)--Pentax Corp. plans to sell its
> > Tokyo headquarters  and 
> > > withdraw from less profitable businesses under
> > strategies the camera maker 
> > > has 
> > > crafted to block a takeover bid by optical glass
> > manufacturer Hoya Corp. , 
> > > The 
> > > Nikkei learned Wednesday. 
> > > ===========
> > > 
> > > I think that gives the news  a slightly different
> > slant.
> > 
> > Yes, that makes a heck of a lot more sense.  I can't
> > imagine the 645D would be 
> > particularly profitable, and even though I'm
> > disappointed in its demise, I 
> > can't say I'm surprised.  Of all the pro studio
> > photographers I met while 
> > working at Reed's (many dozens, at least), maybe two
> > of them used digital 
> > medium format.  One only used it because he was
> > close friends with our 
> > Hasselblad rep.
> > 
> > While digital medium format is a nice idea and has a
> > few image quality 
> > benefits, I just don't think it makes sense from a
> > cost point of view.  
> > Unfortunately for us Pentaxians, Pentax needs to
> > stick with what will make them 
> > money if they want to stay independant (and keep
> > their medical devices business 
> > at the same time).
> > 
> > This probably means the aperture simulator will
> > never show up again, even in a 
> > hypothetical K1D.  Pentax needs all the new-sales
> > revenue it can get right now.
> > 
> > John
> 
> I wonder if a K1D with it's hypothetical FF sensor
> will even be a reality now. If they are focusing on
> beginners and advanced amateurs then I doubt a FF
> camera is on the horizion soon, if ever. Perhaps when
> the switch to FF becomes the norm in DSLR
> manufacturing maybe, but I wonder if Pentax will
> survive that long. This is interesting news
> considering the rumor posted the other day (from
> another forum) about the "new" cameras coming out in
> the fall.
> 
> If they have not had an R&D program running parallel
> with the development of the 645D for a FF DSLR then I
> would call this a big blunder on their part. A full
> frame DSLR would sell in huge numbers vs. a MF digicam
> anyday...even if it were a piece of crap. I would buy
> one today as I'm learning to not much like the 4/3
> system. I just don't see the quality in the smaller
> sensor even if I enjoy using the K10D. So, I would
> dump it in a hot minute for a FF camera that I can use
> all of my existing lenses on.
> 
> At this point, I'm really wondering what is going on
> at Pentax. It may very well be a while before the
> reality of what is happening will be known for sure.
> 
> -Brendan
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to