In photography, the closest one may come is to have no idea who shot an image of a scene that you yourself have never seen before and you don't even suspect what make camera or lens were used.
Jack --- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/5/07, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >objectivity: judgment based on observable phenomena and uninfluenced > by > >emotions or personal prejudices > > Oh boy. My wife and I were discussing this just last night. > > My stance is that your definition of objectivity is impossible. > > In fact - as far as human beings are concerned, there is no such > thing > as objectivity. > > > -- > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > _____________________________ > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
