Well said, Mark. Jack --- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cotty wrote: > > >On 8/5/07, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > >>Almost every single photo shown here meets with praise. > > > >That's because a lot of people here won't comment on pics that don't > do > >anything for them. Me included. Policy. > > That's my policy, too. And I've found that many (not all) of the > negative comments I do see fall into the categories of > nit-picking-pixel-peeping or are over things like oversharpening that > > apply only to the web image and not the eventual print (which is what > I > always regard as the final product of a photograph). My observation > is > that there seems to be a lot of scrutinizing trees while ignoring the > > forest. > > That said, I have to admit that the appeal of this specific > photograph > of Godfrey's completely escapes me. I just don't see anything there. > But that's just me. No photo has to please *everyone*. > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
