----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Peso Squatter's Rights
> 600 pixels is too small. This is a photography list, and most viewers want > to be able to judge image quality. Even at 1200 pixels that can be > difficult. At 600 it's impossible. The 600 pixel constraint was put in when monitors were smaller, bandwidth was expensive, lots of people were on dial-up, and dinosaurs still roamed the earth. I can happily view an image of 800 vertical pixels, providing there is no page formatting above and below it on a 1280x960 monitor. I hate scrolling pages though. Consider that while this is a photography list, we don't all have or can afford Cinema displays, nor are we willing to overdrive 19 inch monitors to 1200x1600 pixels, since the quality turns to crap anyway. While it may be time to relax the image size constraints, please don't turn the PUG into a gallery by and for elitists with the latest equipment. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
