Unreasonably! If it is not safe to not take up a lane, then they should. A bicycle is nothing more, nor less, than a slow moving vehicle, and should be treated the same by other drivers and the cops.
David Savage wrote: > On 5/6/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 5/6/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Perfectly legal. Pass them like you would a car in that lane. >> With the very narrow & busy roads around here, finding a break in the >> oncoming traffic to pass can take a while. I'd prefer if they'd ride >> single file. > > I just checked the local road rules. 4 abreast isn't legal. 2 abreast > with no more than 1.5 metres between them is the rule. > > And 1 cyclist in the middle of the lane holding up traffic isn't legal either: > > "Causing an obstruction > > The rider of a bicycle shall not unreasonably obstruct or prevent free > passage of a vehicle or pedestrian upon a path or road. Similarly, > vehicles and pedestrians shall not unreasonably obstruct cyclists." > > Cheers, > > Dave > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
