Not really, unfortunately. Besides it's disposable. Rick Womer wrote: > Beautiful photo. The building isn't getting > iconic-grade maintenance, though, is it? > > Rick > > --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I guess it would help to include a link... >> >> >> > http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_summerhome.html > >> P. J. Alling wrote: >> >>> This is something of a local Icon. This little >>> >> summer shack is pretty >> >>> much the last of it's kind in this area. I'm >>> >> firmly of the opinion that >> >>> any home built within 100 yards of the Ocean >>> >> should be considered >> >>> disposable. Apparently no one else agrees with >>> >> me. >> >>> Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax F 35-70mm >>> >> f3.5~4.5 >> >>> B&W conversion using Fotomatic B&W Plus/Red Filter >>> >> applied. >> >>> As usual comments are welcome but may be totally >>> >> ignored. >> >>> >>> >> -- >> Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee >> ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl >> fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> > > > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > >
-- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
