If Hoya buys Pentax, drops cameras and keeps endoscopes, as is likely, 
you'll have the same problem...

Tom C wrote:
>> From a Feb 5 2007 report regarding Pentax:
>
> On the other hand, management lowered its full-year estimate for the life
> care segment to ¥3.4 bn, from ¥4.3 bn due to (1) shortfalls in planned 
> sales
> of airway scopes, (2) increased competition in the market for artificial
> bones, and (3) the delayed launch of its new flexible endoscope. It also
> lowered its target for optical components segment, evidently owing to
> production cutbacks at customers for its micro lenses and inventory
> valuation losses on lens units
>
> Our overall impression is Neutral but results for the life care 
> segment, a
> center of investor attention, was a bit disappointing.
>
> ----
>
> Other reports indicate that Pentax is facing huge competition in the 
> medical arena by companies with deeper pockets.
>
> Alot of this doesn't have anything to do with whether one has a good 
> product or if it's selling well.  It has to do with whether one is 
> making enough profit to keep shareholders happy AND continue to 
> innovate and turn out new products.
>
> Assuming Pentax and Canon is spending the same amount on R&D which is 
> a bad assumption to begin with, if Pentax is making 1/5 the profit on 
> each DSLR as Canon is (I think my example is in the ballpark), they 
> would need to sell roughly 5x as many units in order to continue R&D 
> at the same rate.
>
> They are essentially facing an uphill struggle on an incline that gets 
> steeper and steeper.
>
> Yes, Pentax could drop the camera division all on their own, without 
> Hoya.  I just can't figure out what I'd do with an endoscope though.
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Pentax Update - Shakeup in the Works (again)
>> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:27:27 -0400
>>
>> You're looking at the Imaging division, look at the whole picture.  If
>> Pentax wanted to increase profit margins they could drop camera
>> development and sales themselves.  They don't need Hoya for that.  There
>> seems to be nothing but upside potential in their medical and other
>> divisions.
>>
>> Tom C wrote:
>> > Not really.  With Pentax market share in DSLR's around 6% and 
>> profit margins
>> > down around 2% on digital cameras, it gets harder and harder to 
>> compete in
>> > the face of competitors who are continuing to gain market share and 
>> are
>> > realizing economies of scale and higher profit margins either by
>> > manufacturing their own components or by sheer buying power.
>> >
>> > How long does one wait before deciding they can't go it alone?  
>> Evidently
>> > Pentax management thought something must be done, not just Sparx.
>> >
>> >
>> > Tom C.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> >> Subject: Re: Pentax Update - Shakeup in the Works (again)
>> >> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:33:24 -0400
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> Sparx had supported Urano's efforts to pursue a merger with Hoya 
>> amid
>> >>>
>> >> the
>> >>
>> >>> belief that Pentax would not be able to survive on its own.
>> >>>
>> >> Does anyone else see a self fulfilling prophecy here?
>> >>
>> >> Tom C wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Excerpts...
>> >>>
>> >>> TOKYO (Nikkei)--Pentax Corp.'s  top shareholder, Sparx Group Co., 
>> plans
>> >>> to back the appointment of directors to the camera manufacturer's
>> >>> board who would support Hoya Corp.'s tender offer plans
>> >>>
>> >>> This could bode ill for Pentax President Takashi Watanuki and 
>> others who
>> >>> voted down a proposed merger with Hoya and are said to be against a
>> >>>
>> >> business
>> >>
>> >>> integration with the firm.  Sparx aims to use its 23.98% stake in 
>> Pentax
>> >>>
>> >> to
>> >>
>> >>> nudge the company toward accepting a business integration with Hoya.
>> >>>
>> >>> With all eight Pentax directors facing re-election at an upcoming
>> >>>
>> >> general
>> >>
>> >>> shareholders meeting scheduled for June 22, Sparx plans to 
>> propose the
>> >>> reappointment of former President Fumio Urano and former 
>> Executive Vice
>> >>> President Katsuo Morio to the board.  The pro-merger Urano and Morio
>> >>>
>> >> were
>> >>
>> >>> relieved of their duties as executives earlier this month.
>> >>>
>> >>> ...
>> >>>
>> >>> Sparx apparently believes that its proposed appointments will go 
>> through
>> >>> if it can win the support of overseas shareholders who are highly
>> >>>
>> >> conscious
>> >>
>> >>> of
>> >>> measures aimed at improving Pentax's enterprise value.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sparx had supported Urano's efforts to pursue a merger with Hoya 
>> amid
>> >>>
>> >> the
>> >>
>> >>> belief that Pentax would not be able to survive on its own.
>> >>>
>> >>> ...
>> >>>
>> >>> Citing an internal rift at Pentax, Sparx will call for an 
>> overhaul of
>> >>>
>> >> the
>> >>
>> >>> camera manufacturer's leadership to prevent an erosion in the 
>> company's
>> >>> share
>> >>> price and other enterprise values.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Tom C.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> --
>> >> Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend 
>> lw uf
>> >> thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw 
>> uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>


-- 
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf 
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to