All right!! That's got to be the answer and explains why some images
are more prone to this phenomenon than others. I think maybe cat fur
may be the worst offender. Photo fur balls.

Jack
--- John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> That looks like the sort of explanation Calvin's dad would provide
> :-)
> 
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 10:01:05PM +0100, Bob W wrote:
> > It's photon residue, popularly known as 'light lint'. It's
> scientific
> > Latin name is 'Floccus lucis'. 
> > 
> > The stuff that the filter stops from going into the lens has to go
> > somewhere, and so it gets trapped between the filter and the front
> > element. It's the light equivalent of all that fluff that
> accumulates
> > in the filter of your clothes dryer and which is so satisfying to
> > remove.
> > 
> > --
> >  Bob
> >  
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> > > Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
> > > Sent: 23 April 2007 21:00
> > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > Subject: Re: Protection glass / filters, especially consumer
> glass
> > > 
> > > In my case it was more than dust, but something more akin to 
> > > a haze or a
> > > film.  Yeah, there was a little dust in there as well.
> > > 
> > > Apart from the dust, my theory about the haze is that there may
> be
> > > something in the lens, like lubricants, that emit some gas or 
> > > evaporate
> > > slightly (we've all experienced the lubricant getting dry at 
> > > one time or
> > > another), and that the filter over the lens element prevents the
> > > evaporation from just dissipating into the atmosphere.
> > > 
> > > Dust, like rust, never sleeps!
> > > 
> > > Shel
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > [Original Message]
> > > > From: William Robb 
> > > 
> > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
> > > >
> > > > Subject: Re: Protection glass / filters, especially consumer
> glass
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Apr 23, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> BTW, in my world dust cannot 
> > > > > > migrate to the area between the filter
> > > > >> and the lens unless the filter is removed. :)
> > > > >
> > > > > lol ... Do you have them sealed somehow?  ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > > I always thought that too, which is why I found the 
> > > consistent build
> > > > > up of dusty film between the two quite curious.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I could never figure that out either. I had a filter on my 
> > > Nikkor 50/1.4 
> > > > from the time I bought it. I was pretty good about cleaning 
> > > the front 
> > > > surface, but ignored the inside surfaces. It was quite 
> > > amazing how much
> > > dust 
> > > > was in there after a year or so.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to