This is really incredible,

Posting my name and that word in a subject heading/title/thread
and without any provocation whatsoever, is NOT BAIT, it's just a really
low, very cheap shot that is totally uncalled for and totally
inappropriate
in a public forum. Your characterization of it as "BAIT" is completely
off the mark and the suggestion that I should just say nothing
about that kind of thing makes YOU of the same persuasion of the
loser who did it. He's got the problem for doing so , NOT ME, for " not
letting
it slide"
jco


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
AlexG
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:20 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Please, let this thread die: MSNBC Poll: Is...


Let me put it this way.

As a new person on the PDML I've only had access to the archives of
2006-2007... where I witnessed the largest flamewar in intarwebb
history.

Everytime someone posts a jab at this JCO guy, he gets all pissy and
responds in kind.

The jab shouldn't be posted in the first place as it's inappropriate
(though in this instance  I was kind of amused at the mock-headline.)
Inappropriate because YOU KNOW it'll cause trouble/flames.

Similarly, JCO should not take the bait, predictably, every single
freaking time. Not every post requires a response. Just have a beer and
let it slide, man.

We're all here because we like taking pictures with our Pentax gear.
That should be enough.

Alex

On 4/21/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed, only a person of that persuation would
> do something like that, its unprecedented and
> it wasnt even provoked, it was just posted in
> "fun". A Real Sicko IMHO.
> jco
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of Lasse Karlsson
> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 6:22 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Please, let this thread die: MSNBC Poll: Is...
>
>
> I think naming a thread with a list member's name and the word 
> "a*****e" in the subject line is punching too far below the belt.
>
> I'm equally surprised with many list members' reactions to JCO:s posts

> as I am with JCO:s willingness to fight at such lenght for whatever 
> view or statement which has been challenged.
>
> Personally I can enjoy a good fight. And JCO:s a very good fighter. 
> Even
>
> when responding by calling names in capital letters I think he's 
> mostly right on the mark with it. Usually it has simply been called 
> for. And yes, I also enjoy seeing JCO being challenged. He mostly asks

> for it too.
>
> However, if these flames or threads get to be too much for many 
> members, or the list, to take, I think it's not fair pointing finger 
> at JCO only.
>
> Lasse
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to