The A* 400 f2.8 can produce some horrendous bokeh too.

Near out of focus elements can look really bad. I tested it by focusing 
in on an isolated subject - like a single grass stalk - and the slowly 
de-focusing by moving the focal point closer. The image would initially 
split into two softer versions of itself which would then ultimately 
blur out into a pleasing bokeh. But if you got a bunch of stuff in that 
"split in two" range the bokeh would look like a mess.

A couple of examples of bad bokeh -

http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/birds/b0009.htm
http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/birds/0204b59.htm

One the flip side - it can produce a nice bokeh and sometimes a 
distinctive one in some lighting situations.

Nice:

http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/birds/0308b18.htm
http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/new/lis082.htm

Distinctive:

http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/birds/0204b49.htm

Your sample is a pretty high contrast harsh light situation - perhaps 
the bokeh would look better in more moderate light, different distance 
for the out of focus background etc.


- MCC



J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>  I bought a Pentax SMC-M 85mm f2.0
> lens 20 months ago and tried it
> for the first time today ( I know,
> the buy/try delay is very long!).
> 
> Anyway, its very sharp stopped down
> a little bit, excellent contrast, no
> distortion, little if any CA,
> but damn the bokeh looks like
> crap to me. I wouldnt wan't to use
> this for any bokeh dominant type pix...
> 
> I havent read or heard this anywhere.
> Whats the concensus?  I have posted
> a photo shot wide open, look at
> the background and tell me what you
> think?
> 
> I even noticed some specular highlights
> can create ring like bokeh found on mirror
> lenses (not seen in this photo) which was
> pretty shocking.
> 
> http://www.jchriso.com/temp/85MM01.jpg
> pentax smc-m f2.0 at F2.0, 1/4000 sec
> on istDS body.
> 
> JCO
> 
> 


-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, Michigan
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to