huh? I have much gear much BETTER and more expensive photo gear than current Pentax DSLR picture quality. I also already bought a Pentax DSLR so I dont get your point. As for my reluctance to buy the Pentax top line model DSLR, I think it pretty well documented here that I dont agree its missing a cheap part that is making all my precious valuable K/M MF lenses crippled functionally....I simply dont WANT it bad enough as clearly explained because it's not meeting the "really good" requirement for me to want it bad enough. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mike wilson Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:30 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: OT - for those of you who have DVD equip that can playPAL > > From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/04/20 Fri AM 12:59:49 GMT > To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: OT - for those of you who have DVD equip that can playPAL > > You're full of doo doo. I have stated this before > and will state it again, people dont buy expensive gear because they > "THINK" its really good just because its "expensive", they buy > expensive gear because they KNOW its really good and want it bad > enough they are willing to pay "expensive price" to get it. The horse > pulls the cart, the cart doesnt push the horse. In those terms, could you explain digital photography to me. Especially DSLRs, picture quality and your reluctance to buy one - versus the millions who already had. ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
